“Not All
TEXT: Romans 9:6-13
REVIEW
1. Paul’s Love for His Countrymen: What a Christ-like love Paul displays for his countrymen, the Jews! If he could, he would suffer the pains of hell for them, that they might be saved. But he cannot do this. He is himself chosen by God, and the purposes of God’s election cannot be overturned. Furthermore Paul does not have the requisite righteousness and eternal nature necessary to successfully atone for anyone’s sins.
2. God’s Love for Paul: Why then does Paul make the point in such a solemn way at the beginning of this chapter that he would face hell for the Jews if it could save them? God is giving us a glimpse into the redeemed heart that is truly moved by the love of Christ. Paul is imitating God’s love – not in some showy hypocrisy, but in all sincerity. Paul knows the love of God for him, and he is moved by this love to have a true love for his kindred who are of God’s chosen people.
TODAY’S
PASSAGE:
Romans
9:6-13 6 But it is not that the word of
God has taken no effect. For they are not all
What happened
to the chosen people?
For years I have walked to church with my
neighbor and co-laborer, Pastor Steve Bartell of the
But
what if we could not count on God’s promises?
What if God had made a promise of eternal salvation to a people and then
had abandoned them to His judgment? Paul
in Romans 8 has written of the great plan of God in his love for His chosen
ones. Those words would not mean much if
God had made promises to others in the past and had not been faithful to His
word. Some might suggest that this is
precisely what has happened in God’s dealing with the Old Covenant people, the
Israelites.
The
apostle Paul wants to address this potential objection in the verses before us
today. In order to make his point Paul
goes back to the first book of the Bible – Genesis. Paul would have us consider the story of
Isaac (the son of Abraham), and the story of Jacob (the grandson of Abraham,
and the son of Isaac) in order to see the truth about God’s promises.
This
man Jacob, the grandson of Abraham, had a second name that was given to him by
God. That name was
The Example of
Isaac
Paul quotes from Genesis 21
here. Let’s take a look at the context:
Genesis 21:9-13 9 And Sarah saw the son of Hagar
the Egyptian, whom she had borne to Abraham, scoffing. 10 Therefore she said to Abraham,
"Cast out this bondwoman and her son; for the son of this bondwoman shall
not be heir with my son, namely with Isaac." 11 And the matter was very
displeasing in Abraham's sight because of his son. 12 But God said to Abraham,
"Do not let it be displeasing in your sight because of the lad or because
of your bondwoman. Whatever Sarah has said to you, listen
to her voice; for in Isaac your seed shall be called. 13 Yet I will also make a nation
of the son of the bondwoman, because he is your seed."
God
had a great plan for both of Abraham’s sons, but only one of them (Isaac) was
the child of God’s promise. The other
son (Ishmael) was the child of Sarah’s plan that Abraham agreed to. Despairing because of her inability to have a
child, Sarah came up with the plan that Hagar, Sarah’s
Egyptian maidservant could produce offspring for her. Ishmael was Abraham’s son according to the
flesh, but he was not the child of the promise.
Paul
quotes the promise of God from an earlier chapter in Genesis to make his point:
Genesis 18:9-14 9 Then they said to him, "Where
is Sarah your wife?" So he said, "Here, in the tent." 10 And He said, "I will
certainly return to you according to the time of life, and behold, Sarah your
wife shall have a son." (Sarah was listening in the tent door which was
behind him.) 11 Now Abraham
and Sarah were old, well advanced in age; and Sarah had passed the age of
childbearing. 12 Therefore
Sarah laughed within herself, saying, "After I have grown old, shall I
have pleasure, my lord being old also?"
13 And the LORD said to Abraham, "Why did Sarah laugh,
saying, 'Shall I surely bear a child, since I am old?' 14 "Is anything too hard for
the LORD? At the appointed time I will return to you, according to the time of
life, and Sarah shall have a son."
The promise was not only that Abraham would have
a son but that Sarah would have a son.
Ishmael could never have been counted as the child of the promise,
despite the custom that would have counted the servant’s son as the son of
Sarah. The promised child would come by
God’s gift, and not by man’s panic.
Isaac was the elect son, and not Ishmael. Though God would have a great plan for
Ishmael, there is no sign that the son of Hagar was given eternal life, though
he was a son of Abraham.
The Example of
Jacob
On to the second generation. This time we are not dealing with
half-brothers, but twin brothers. Once
again, the child of promise would be a gift from God to a woman that could not
conceive. But this time two boys would
be given to her, yet only one would be chosen by God for salvation.
Genesis 25:21-23 21 Now
Isaac pleaded with the LORD for his wife, because she was barren; and the LORD
granted his plea, and Rebekah his wife
conceived. 22 But the
children struggled together within her; and she said, "If all is well, why
am I like this?" So she went to inquire of the LORD. 23 And the LORD said to her:
"Two nations are in your womb, Two peoples shall
be separated from your body; One people shall be stronger than the other, And
the older shall serve the younger."
The two boys were Esau (the older) and Jacob. Even before they were born, before they had
any opportunity to do either good or evil, the announcement of God’s choice
(election) was made. Esau would serve
Jacob. The Edomites
would be the descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Esau, but the Israelites would
be descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and it would be from the
Israelites that the promised Messiah would come.
Paul goes on in Romans 9 to quote from the prophet
Malachi, who speaks of God’s plans for the nation of
Malachi 1:2-5 2 " I have loved you,"
says the LORD. "Yet you say, 'In what way have You
loved us?' Was not Esau Jacob's brother?" Says the LORD.
"Yet Jacob I have loved;
3 But Esau I have hated, And laid waste his mountains
and his heritage For the jackals of the wilderness." 4 Even though
The Only
Alternative to Election
Paul is very specific in the conclusions that he draws
from the case of the twin brothers Jacob and Esau. He says that God did this in order that his
purpose in election might stand, “not of works but of Him who calls.” There were many things in the lives of these
men that were worthy of comment, and the Bible does that in other places, but
in Romans 9 Paul is not interested in the works of these two brothers. He is interested in the electing purpose of
God.
Here’s a fair question for
you to ask. Should we be concerned about
the doctrine of election? When there are
so many places where the good news of Christ needs to be preached, and when
there is so much suffering in this world, who cares
about twin brothers born thousands of years ago?
Well, of course, God
does. That needs to be enough reason for
the rest of us. Part of the beauty of
preaching through books of the Bible, is that you are not permitted to just skip
things that you would rather avoid. This
fits in with the clear example we are given for our imitation in Acts 20:27
that the Apostle Paul declared the “whole counsel of God.”
I guess when I come to a
passage like this I could preach about kittens, but I’m not sure that you would
stand for that. But there is something
for you to consider here. God does
things on purpose and he is very wise and loving toward his people. The words of Romans 9 are for your
benefit.
The Jews had used the
doctrine of election in the wrong way.
They had turned election into a matter of national spiritual pride. How odd that we would take pride in the
doctrine that insists that it’s all about God and not about us!
Spiritual pride demeans the
cross of Christ, but election does not support pride. It attacks it.
There is only one
alternative to salvation by the electing grace of God, and that is salvation by
the good works of man. Even if your good
works are reduced to a good decision for Jesus, it still puts the focus on you
and not on the Lord. Our focus needs to
be on the God who loved us, and gave Himself for us. We have not been saved by God because of any
good work, or even because of any good decision. We were chosen by Him about the same time
that He determined that He loved Jacob.
Not every genetic descendant of elect parents yields an elect baby. God’s promises to
God’s promises have not
failed. His word of promise has always
been and shall always be for the elect.
As much as it pains Paul, he must conclude, “They are not all